Mobile Header

Mobile Header

Thursday, October 30, 2025

Reformed Anglican Church (Uganda) Enters Corporate Communion with United Roman-Ruthenian Church

By A. DiNardo

ROME-RUTHENIA 29 October 2025 (NRom)

His Illustrious Highness the Most Reverend Jonathan Kyangasha, ecclesiastical Archduke of Verulamius, Primate of Uganda and head of the Reformed Anglican Church of Uganda (RAC), has entered into corporate communion with the United Roman‑Ruthenian Church (URRC), by decree and Apostolic mandate of His Holiness the Roman-Ruthenian Pope. Simultaneously, the RAC will retain its existing internal structure, identity, customs, and autonomous governance, now recognised as a territorial jurisdiction within the Apostolic Congregation of the Consistory of the Holy Apostolic See, the curial office charged with oversight and support of patriarchates, primatial sees, provinces and dioceses in communion with the URRC.

The faithful of the RAC (Uganda) now participate in the URRC’s worldwide communion, sharing in its mission, liturgical life, and ecclesial family. This union marks a step in the URRC’s stated goal of “preserving and renewing the Orthodox-Catholic faith in its full inheritance” — bridging the Latin and Byzantine traditions as the Eastern Roman Church with Latin heritage.

Archbishop Kyangasha founded the Reformed Anglican Church of Uganda (RAC) in 2017, and currently serves as its primate.  Prior to that, he served in the Anglican tradition in Uganda (Anglican Communion). The RAC has been expanding its presence across Uganda. For example, in 2024 the ordination of Rev. Spencer Byamukama as vicar in the Kigezi archdeaconry in southern Uganda was officiated by Archbishop Kyangasha. His stabilising leadership comes amid a backdrop of ecclesial unrest within Ugandan Anglicanism: some communities dissatisfied with the processes and leadership of the Church of Uganda have joined the RAC under Kyangasha’s primacy. 

This corporate communion signals an ecclesial unity of a different kind. The URRC is an autocephalous Church with inheritance of Western (Latin) and Eastern (Byzantine, Russian, Syrian) traditions. The entry of the RAC (Uganda) as an autonomous territorial jurisdiction in corporate communion with the URRC underscores the Church's growing global footprint.

For clergy and laity of the RAC, the communion affirms recognition of their episcopal orders, sacraments and ministry within a wider communion, which represents both pastoral affirmation and canonical security. And, the RAC maintains liturgical and structural autonomy, respecting ancient ecclesiastical customs and dynamics, placing the RAC in a global communion context while retaining local identity. This is an example of an authentic ecumenical approach, a testament to Christian unity lived out in institutional form.

The new corporate communion of the Reformed Anglican Church (Uganda) with the URRC opens a fresh chapter in ecclesial identity and mission. The link to a global Holy Apostolic See, with acknowledged territorial status in the URRC’s structure, may enable expanded resources, broader relational networks, and deeper sacramental affirmation.

For the United Roman-Ruthenian Church, this partnership marks a further step in its strategy of global outreach and communion-building, particularly in Africa. Uganda, as a vibrant Christian context, offers both challenges and opportunities for living out this emerging ecclesial model. The communion holds great promise for deeper unity, stronger recognition, and broader mission of service in Uganda and beyond.

Sunday, October 26, 2025

Celebrating the Living Heritage of Sacred Art and Culture

By Staff

ROME-RUTHENIA 26 October 2025 (NRom)

His Apostolic Highness the Most Holy Prince-Bishop Radislav I of Rome-Ruthenia, together with Her Apostolic Highness the Apostolic Princess, attended a performance of Spyashchaya Krsavitsa (The Sleeping Beauty) by Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky — one of the crowning masterpieces of the classical repertoire and a timeless reflection of Christian artistry within the Russian cultural tradition.

The Pontifical and Imperial Household continues its long-standing dedication to the arts as a vital expression of faith, beauty, and civilization. The United Roman-Ruthenian Church regards music, dance, and fine art not merely as entertainment, but as sacred extensions of divine creativity — mirrors through which humanity perceives the harmony of God’s creation.

Tchaikovsky’s work, blending grace, discipline, and spiritual depth, remains a reminder that art transcends all political or temporal divisions. It speaks instead to the eternal soul of a people and of humanity itself, the same universality that the Church seeks to preserve and uphold in every nation and culture. In supporting the arts, we honor not only the gifts of the Creator, but also the shared heritage that unites East and West in beauty, reverence, and peace.

Saturday, October 18, 2025

Appointment of the Most Reverend Adrián Guedes as Prefect of the Liturgy, Roman-Ruthenian Curia

His Excellency Bishop Adrián Guedes
By M. Derosiers

BUENOS AIRES 16 October 2025 (NRom)

(La versión castellana se encuentra a continuación.)

His Apostolic Highness the Most Holy Prince-Bishop Radislav I, Roman-Ruthenian Pope has appointed His Excellency Bishop Adrián Guedes to the Curial Office of Prefect of the Liturgy for the United Roman-Ruthenian Church and Pontifical Imperial State. Monsignor Guedes, already a bishop, was also elevated to the rank of Capitular Bishop within the Patriarchal Chapter of the Pontifical Court

Prefect of the Liturgy is head of one of the major offices, known as Prefectures, of the Roman-Ruthenian Curia, the central government of the Roman-Ruthenian Church and State. As Prefect of the Liturgy, Bishop Guedes is responsible for ensuring fidelity to the Apostolic tradition in in the liturgy of the Church in its various Western and Eastern usages. His prefecture also includes the Holy Apostolic Office for the Glorification of the Saints, the curial office responsible for evaluating causes for canonization. 

In addition to his curial responsibilities, Monsignor Guedes serves as Chaplain to His Royal Highness Sire Rubén and the Royal Merovingian Household, continuing a long tradition of pastoral ministry to the faithful and to the noble families associated with the Church’s apostolic and imperial heritage.

The United Roman-Ruthenian Church and Pontifical Imperial State stands as the rightful temporal successor of Saint Peter, bearing the historical and documented patrimony of Rome and Russia through Saint Leo X, with full Orthodox and Catholic autocephalous authority — equal in dignity to the Vatican, Constantinople, and the other ancient Patriarchates.

Continuing the unity of the pre-Schism Christian faith, the Church acts as guardian of the theological, liturgical, and cultural treasures of Christendom. It is the true visible Orthodox head of all Latin Christians, in addition to all others under her sacred mantle of care. The Church serves as the Orthodox Old Catholic jurisdiction for the historic lands of the Western Patriarchate and Holy Rus’.

The United Roman-Ruthenian Church remains steadfast in its mission: to safeguard the ancient faith, to proclaim the truth of Christ in all nations, and to uphold the spiritual sovereignty of the Apostolic Church in its fullness.

_________________________

La versión castellana:

Su Alteza Apostólica, el Santísimo Príncipe-Obispo Radislav I, Papa Romano-Ruteno, ha nombrado a Su Excelencia Mons. Adrián Guedes para el cargo curial de Prefecto de la Liturgia de la Iglesia Unida Romano-Rutena y del Estado Pontificio Imperial. Monseñor Guedes, ya obispo, fue asimismo elevado al rango de Obispo Capitular dentro del Capítulo Patriarcal de la Corte Pontificia.

El Prefecto de la Liturgia es el jefe de uno de los principales departamentos, conocidos como Prefecturas, de la Curia Romano-Rutena, el órgano central de gobierno de la Iglesia y el Estado Romano-Rutenos. Como Prefecto de la Liturgia, el Obispo Guedes es responsable de garantizar la fidelidad a la tradición apostólica en la liturgia de la Iglesia, tanto en sus usos occidentales como orientales. Su prefectura incluye también la Santa Oficina Apostólica para la Glorificación de los Santos, el organismo curial encargado de evaluar las causas de canonización.

Además de sus responsabilidades curiales, Monseñor Guedes ejerce como Capellán de Su Alteza Real Sire Rubén y de la Casa Real Merovingia, continuando una larga tradición de ministerio pastoral hacia los fieles y las familias nobles vinculadas al patrimonio apostólico e imperial de la Iglesia.

La Iglesia Unida Romano-Rutena y el Estado Pontificio Imperial se erigen como el legítimo sucesor temporal de San Pedro, portando el patrimonio histórico y documentado de Roma y Rusia a través de San León X, con plena autoridad autocéfala ortodoxa y católica, igual en dignidad al Vaticano, Constantinopla y los demás antiguos Patriarcados.

En continuidad con la unidad de la fe cristiana anterior al Cisma, la Iglesia actúa como guardiana de los tesoros teológicos, litúrgicos y culturales de la cristiandad. Es la verdadera cabeza ortodoxa visible de todos los cristianos latinos, además de todos aquellos que están bajo su sagrado manto de cuidado. La Iglesia sirve como jurisdicción ortodoxa Viejo Católica para las tierras históricas del Patriarcado Occidental y de la Santa Rus’.

La Iglesia Unida Romano-Rutena permanece firme en su misión: salvaguardar la fe antigua, proclamar la verdad de Cristo a todas las naciones y defender la soberanía espiritual de la Iglesia Apostólica en toda su plenitud.

Wednesday, October 15, 2025

United Roman-Ruthenian Church Establishes Province in the Russian Lands

H.E. Metropolitan Augustine
of Irkutsk

By A. DiNardo

IRKUTSK, 15 October 2025 (NRom)

The United Roman-Ruthenian Church (URRC) has announced the formal establishment of its Province in the Russian Lands, marking a significant development in the Church’s mission to serve the faithful across the historic territories of Holy Rus’, marking a significant development in the Church’s mission to serve the faithful across the historic territories of Holy Rus’, in response to growing pastoral needs and the call to deepen Christian unity within the Orthodox-Catholic tradition

The newly created ecclesiastical province is headed by Metropolitan Augustine of Irkutsk, who will oversee several parishes and a growing number of faithful members throughout the region. The province follows the traditional Anglican-Catholic Rite of the United Roman-Ruthenian Church, preserving the Western Orthodox liturgical and theological patrimony within the fullness of the Orthodox-Catholic faith. The local jurisdiction has also been officially registered for several years with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation, underscoring the Church’s ongoing commitment to its global pastoral mission and the diverse lands of its cultural and spiritual heritage. 

 A facsimile of the first page of the Pontifical Decree of Establishment for the Province in the Russian Lands, rendered in the traditional language and orthography of Old Russian, has been released by the Pontifical Chancery.

According to the Holy Apostolic See, the new province has been affiliated with the United Roman-Ruthenian Church through its pontifical court for several years. The recent transfer of the jurisdiction to direct patriarchal oversight was authorized by His Apostolic Highness the Most Holy Pope Radislav I of Rome-Ruthenia, acting for pastoral and administrative reasons. The province now forms an integral part of the Catholicate of Rome-Ruthenia, the personal patriarchal jurisdiction of the Prince-Bishop of Rome-Ruthenia. 

The United Roman-Ruthenian Church, also known as the Roman-Ruthenian Church and State, continues the temporal and spiritual patrimony of the Apostolic See of St. Peter, united historically with both Rome and Rus’ through the legacy of St. Leo X and his successor. The Church maintains Orthodox and Catholic autocephalous authority, equal in dignity to the ancient Patriarchates of Rome, Constantinople, and others. 

The Holy Apostolic See of the United Roman-Ruthenian Church is the true visible Orthodox head of all Latin Christians, and for all others entrusted to her pastoral care. The Church serves as the Orthodox Old Catholic jurisdiction for the historic lands of the Western Patriarchate and Holy Rus’. The URRC is the Eastern Roman Church with Latin heritage, the continuation of the Apostolic faith in both East and West. Its mission is to preserve and renew the Orthodox-Catholic faith in its full inheritance. 

The establishment of the Province in the Russian Lands signifies not only the continued growth of the URRC’s global mission but also the strengthening of its pastoral presence across the Eurasian region. The United Roman-Ruthenian Church, however, is not a political organization, but rather a religious, cultural, and ethnic body. It does not seek civil rule, but is dedicated to the unity of faith, the preservation of Christian tradition, and the promotion of peace and reconciliation among peoples and cultures. 

In this spirit, the establishment of the Province in the Russian Lands reflects the Church’s ongoing mission to bear witness to the undivided faith of Christ’s One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church — a living bridge of love and tradition uniting East and West in the peace of the Gospel.

Satire Meets the Ivory Tower: “Trying to Sue the U” Exposes Academia’s Dark Underbelly with Wit and Courage

By A. DiNardo 

ROME-RUTHENIA 15 October 2025 (NRom)

Brace yourself for an academic adventure like no other.

Fiction—or not?—the truth
here stings.

Trying to Sue the U, is a satirical epic poem circulating online, now celebrating its one-year anniversary. The epic takes readers on a rollicking journey through the labyrinth of modern higher education. It’s a biting fairy tale for grown-ups—equal parts tragic, comic, and cathartic—that exposes the contradictions, bureaucratic absurdities, and moral compromises within universities today.

At its heart, this is not just literature—it’s a mirror held up to power.


A Brave Lecturer vs. the Ivory Tower

In this grand allegory, readers follow “The Brave Little Lecturer,” a defiant figure who dares to challenge the entrenched hierarchies of academia. When he confronts injustice—wage theft, retaliation, discrimination—he finds himself battling a hydra-headed institution that protects itself at all costs.

The poem’s strength lies in its clear-eyed portrayal of systemic failure wrapped in razor-sharp satire. Each character, from “Sneaky Snake” the campus ruler to “Big Gopher” the cold-hearted HR bureaucrat, embodies a familiar archetype of modern university life. On the surface they may seem exaggerated, but  in fact they are painfully recognizable to anyone who’s spent time in academia’s shadowed halls.

Sneaky Snake, the evil campus administrator
who terrorizes all the faculty

Through rhyme and rhythm, the author transforms what could be a grim exposé into something more powerful: a chorus of protest disguised as play.

A parody that reads like a case file.

Lifting the Lid on Academic Hypocrisy

Universities have long marketed themselves as temples of truth and enlightenment. Yet Trying to Sue the U peels back that glossy veneer to reveal a troubling picture—one of censorship, hypocrisy, and double standards.

"Nokloo," the Not-So-Fearless Campus Leader, ever feckless

From administrators who “bury their heads in the sand” to lawyers who weaponize taxpayer money, the poem skewers the machinery of institutional self-preservation. It’s a “civil rights fairy tale,” yes, but one with real-world implications. 

With Truth and Justice, the Brave
Little Lecture thwarts the greedy lawyers

For many adjuncts, lecturers, and contingent faculty, the Brave Little Lecturer’s plight hits close to home. The satire may be cloaked in whimsy, but its commentary on academic labor conditions is deeply authentic.

They silenced a teacher, but not the story.

The piece asks a burning question: When those who teach justice and ethics fail to practice them, what remains of higher education’s moral authority? Answer: Tyranny. 

A Tradition of Truth Through Humor

In the best tradition of literary satire, from Jonathan Swift to George Orwell, Trying to Sue the U uses humor not to trivialize, but to clarify. Its absurdities illuminate uncomfortable truths about power and privilege within supposedly egalitarian institutions rooted in social justice. 

Chameleon, the diversity officer who pretends to serve and
protect the people, but really protects the university administrators

The poem’s “cast” reads like a fable for the 21st century: “Chameleon,” the diversity officer who protects the powerful; “Big Bark,” the state attorney who defends the machinery of the system; “No-Hope Foryu,” the overworked, hapless, and ineffective federal civil rights officer. Each character highlights how accountability erodes when institutional reputation trumps integrity.

Big Bark, the State Attorney General, whose interest isn't justice,
but protecting the University even when it breaks the law

It’s a clever inversion of the academic epic. Where universities once celebrated intellectual bravery, this poem doesn't just suggest they now punish it, but rather blatantly states it. Yet it does so with a wink and a rhyme, making the medicine go down with a smile.

Art as Accountability

What makes Trying to Sue the U truly significant is its moral courage. In a culture where faculty often fear retaliation for speaking out, this piece breaks the silence through allegory. It invites public engagement in what is too often treated as an internal, untouchable affair.

How the epic satire portrays "Lady Justice,"
a high-priced whore up for sale to the highest bidder

By framing institutional failure as mythic comedy, the author creates distance—enough to laugh, but not enough to look away. The result is a kind of poetic whistleblowing, wielding metaphor instead of lawsuits.

Why It Matters

As academia grapples with crises of integrity, funding, and public trust, Trying to Sue the U feels less like parody and more like prophecy. It reminds us that art can still serve as conscience, that laughter can be resistance, and that even in satire, truth can find its voice.

Behind the humor is a simple demand: fairness, transparency, and the right to speak truth to power without fear.

The satire ends on a happy note, as the Brave Little Lecture refuses to play the
game that has been rigged by the corrupt system, follows his own path, and triumphs over injustice.

And perhaps that’s why the Brave Little Lecturer endures—not as a caricature, but as a symbol of every educator who refuses to give up on the ideal that universities once promised to uphold: that knowledge should serve the public good, not just the powerful few.

In the end, “Trying to Sue the U” may perhaps be fiction (or not?) — but its message is anything but.

Friday, October 10, 2025

New Patriarchal Letter on Christian Duty released by Prince-Bishop of Rome-Ruthenia

By Staff

ROME-RUTHENIA 10 October 2025 (NRom)

In a recently-released patriarchal letter entitled In omni generatione, His Apostolic Highness the Most Holy Prince-Bishop Radislav I, Roman-Ruthenian Pope, Supreme Pontiff of the United Roman-Ruthenian Church, offers a strong and compelling reminder of the Church’s eternal mission amid the shifting sands of politics and national identity. Speaking with the authority of the Apostolic tradition, His Holiness warns against the seductions of nationalism and partisanship that threaten to entangle the Bride of Christ in worldly loyalties. Instead, His Holiness calls clergy and faithful alike to reaffirm their true citizenship in the Kingdom of God, where mercy triumphs over power and truth stands above ideology. This letter serves as both a rebuke and a beacon, urging believers to remain steadfast, compassionate, and unafraid as witnesses to a faith that transcends every earthly empire.

_____________

Complete text of the Patriarchal Letter In Omni Generatione:
(Text in Latin and Old Russian follow)

In every generation, the Church must remind the world that our first allegiance is not to any flag, party, or political philosophy, but to the Kingdom of God. Nations rise and fall, parties change their colors and slogans, yet Christ alone is constant. When the Church forgets this, when she lets herself be caught in the nets of nationalism or ideology, she loses her prophetic voice and becomes merely an echo in the world’s discordant symphony. 

     Clergy especially are called to shun party and partisan politics, for political parties merely seek to use the Church for their own ends. They try to convince the faithful that they alone are the right Chris-tian path, but quickly turn when the Church disagrees, even often suggesting that the party or the nation or a political leader is the true litmus test of religious authority and legitimacy. It is, we must always remember, the Church that proclaims what is Christian, moral, and ethical — and that Church is One, Holy, Apostolic, Orthodox, and Catholic. In some countries, those not of the apostolic faith proclaim to speak for what is Christian, so often creating a bizarre blend of pseudo-Christianity, politics, and nationalism. Stranger still is that often those of the apostolic faith, seeking a Christian society, follow along, ceding their Apostolic birthright to others. This must be al-ways and everywhere avoided, and we must be ever-vigilant against it. This must be always and everywhere avoided, and we must be vig-ilant to keep the Bride of Christ free from worldly entanglements.

     Now, it is not a sin to love one’s homeland, whether it is the place you were born or a land of your ethnic heritage. Love of culture, land, and heritage can be holy in proper measure and when it reflects di-vine charity — in which case it stems from the Christian command to love one's neighbour. But when love becomes pride, and pride be-comes contempt for others, then the nation itself has become an idol. We see it when leaders speak of power more than mercy, and when policy is made without compassion. We see it when people start to think ill on the other side of a border rather than seeing in them the face of Christ. The Gospel does not ask us to make the world in our own image. Rather, it asks us to see Christ in the stranger, the sick, the poor, and the immigrant — for "I was a stranger, and you wel-comed me." 

     Too often, political life today has become a theater of anger, where winning is valued more than wisdom and cruelty is mistaken for strength. The Church must not imitate this spirit, and the faithful must not be drawn into such behavior. Moreover, the faithful must not consider such behavior to be the authentic Christian path. We are not to be the chaplains of any earthly empire, but the conscience of all.

     Our calling is to stand where others fear to stand: between ene-mies, among the suffering, within the storms that always arise. We do not speak with labels such as liberals or conservatives, right-wing or left-wing, but as Christians — Apostolic, Orthodox, Catholic Christians. We are to love truth more than empty, worldly victory, mercy more than comfort, and God more than ever-fleeting nations.

     The Church existed before any kingdom, empire, or republic, and will endure when all have passed away. So many rulers over time have pledged the destruction of the Church on earth, and yet here we stand. We have outlasted every single one of them and will continue to do so. The Church cannot be destroyed, and when it looks dire and the church stands at a precipice, Christ and His Holy Church will conquer. Therefore, let us live as citizens of heaven, faithful, compas-sionate, and unafraid. And let us pray for the conversion of all secular leaders and all people to the Holy Faith of Christ.

______________________________

     In omni generatione, Ecclesia mundum admonere debet primam nostram fidelitatem non ad ullam vexilli formam, factionem, aut philosophiam politicam pertinere, sed ad Regnum Dei. Gentes sur-gunt et cadunt, factiones mutant colores ac clamores suos, Christus autem solus manet immutabilis. Cum Ecclesia hoc obliviscitur, cum se ipsam implicari sinit retibus nationalismi aut ideologiae, vocem suam propheticam amittit, et fit tantum echo in symphonia mundi dissonante.
     Praesertim clerici vocantur ut partium politicarum consortia de-vitent, quippe quae Ecclesiam ad suos fines uti tantum velint. Saepe persuadere conantur fidelibus se solos esse veram viam Christianam, sed statim se vertunt, cum Ecclesia dissentit, etiam suadentes fac-tionem, nationem, aut ducem politicorum esse verum criterium aucto-ritatis ac legitimitatis religionis. Meminisse semper oportet Ecclesiam esse quae definit quid sit vere Christianum, morale, et honestum — eamque Ecclesiam unam, sanctam, apostolicam, orthodoxam et ca-tholicam esse.
     In quibusdam nationibus, quae fide apostolica carent, sibi vindicant loqui pro Christiano nomine, saepe monstrum quoddam pseudo-Christianitatis, politicae et nationalismi conficientes. Mirabilius etiam est quod nonnumquam fideles apostolici, Christianam societatem quaerentes, his consentientes nativum suum apostolicum ius aliis tradunt. Hoc semper et ubique vitandum est, atque oportet nos sem-per vigilare, ne Sponsa Christi vinculis mundanis implicetur.
     Non peccatum est patriam diligere, sive sit terra nativitatis, sive gentis originis. Amor culturae, terrae, ac hereditatis sanctus esse potest, si modum servat et caritatem divinam reflectit, ex praecepto Christiano quod iubet nos proximum diligere. Sed cum amor in su-perbiam vertitur, et superbia in contemptum aliorum, tunc ipsa natio idolum facta est. Id cernimus cum duces de potestate plus quam de misericordia loquuntur, et cum consilia sine compassione statuuntur. Id cernimus etiam cum homines trans fines alios suspectos habere incipiunt, nec amplius in eis vultum Christi agnoscunt. Evangelium non mandat ut mundum ad nostram imaginem fingamus, sed ut Christum in peregrino, in aegroto, in paupere, in advena videamus: “Hospes eram, et suscepistis me.”
     Nimis saepe vita politica hodierna facta est theatrum irae, ubi vincere plus valet quam sapientia, et crudelitas pro fortitudine habe-tur. Ecclesia hunc spiritum imitari nequit, nec fideles tali morum ra-tione decipi debent. Quin etiam, tales mores numquam pro via Chris-tiana habendi sunt. Non sumus cappellani cuiuslibet imperii ter-restris, sed conscientia omnium.

     Vocationem habemus stare ubi alii timent stare: inter inimicos, inter dolentes, in mediis tempestatibus quae semper oriuntur. Non loquimur titulis liberalium aut conservativorum, dexterae aut sinis-trae, sed tamquam Christiani — Apostolici, Orthodoxi, Catholici. Veritatem plus quam inanem victoriam, misericordiam plus quam commodum, Deum plus quam caduca regna diligere debemus.
     Ecclesia ante omnia regna, imperia, ac res publicas exstitit, et per-severabit cum omnia haec transierint. Tot principes per tempora in-teritum Ecclesiae minati sunt, et tamen adhuc stamus. Omnes illos superavimus, et superaturi sumus. Ecclesia destrui non potest; et cum omnia desperata videntur, cum ipsa ad praecipitium stare videtur, Christus et Ecclesia eius sancta triumphabunt.
     Ergo vivamus ut cives caeli, fideles, misericordes, et intrepidi. Et oremus pro conversione omnium ducum saecularium ac totius populi ad Sanctam Fidem Christi.
_____________________________

     Въ каждомъ родѣ и племени Церковь обязана напоминать міру, яко первѣйшее наше послушаніе должно быть не знаме-ни, не партіи, не политическому мудрованію, но Царствію Божію. Царства возстаютъ и падаютъ, партіи изменяютъ свои цвѣта и лозунги, но Христосъ Единъ пребываетъ неизмененъ. Когда же Церковь забываетъ сіе и дозволяетъ себѣ быть уловленною въ сѣти национализма или идеологіи, тогда она утрачиваетъ свой пророческій гласъ и становится токмо от-звукoмъ въ раздвоенномъ гомонѣ міра.
     Особливо же духовенство призывается отвращатися отъ партійности и политическихъ влеченій, понеже партіи ищутъ лишь употребити Церковь въ своихъ тщеславныхъ намѣреніяхъ. Они стараются убѣдити вѣрныхъ, яко только они хранятъ истинный христіанскій путь, но вскоре отвра-щаются, аще Церковь не согласна съ ними, и нередко дерза-ютъ утверждати, яко партія, или народъ, или властелинъ по-литическій — суть мѣрила истинной вѣры и законности. Все-гда же подобаетъ памятовати, яко Церковь есть та, яже воз-вѣщаетъ, что есть христіанское, нравственное и благочести-вое, и та Церковь — Едина, Святая, Соборная и Апостольская. Въ некіихъ странахъ иные, не держащіеся апостольской вѣры, осмѣливаются глаголати отъ имени христіанства, создавая странное смешеніе ложнаго благочестія, политикі и национа-лизма. Еще же страннѣе то, яко иногда и сыны вѣры апо-стольской, желая устроити общество христіанское, следуютъ за ними, уступая свое апостольское достояніе чуждымъ. Сего подобаетъ всегда и всюду избѣгати и бодрствовати, да не бу-детъ Невѣста Христова связана мірскими узами.
     Не есть грѣхъ — любити Отечество, будь то земля, въ коей кто родился, или страна отеческаго рода. Любовь къ куль-турѣ, къ землѣ и къ наследію можетъ быти свята, аще пребу-детъ въ должной мѣрѣ и отражаетъ любовь Божію; ибо тогда она проистекаетъ изъ заповѣди Христовой — любити ближ-няго своего. Но когда любовь обращается въ гордыню, а гор-дыня — въ презрѣніе къ инымъ, тогда народъ самъ становит-ся идоломъ. Мы видимъ сіе, когда вожди глаголютъ болѣе о силѣ, нежели о милосердіи, и когда уставы творятся безъ со-страданія. Мы видимъ сіе, когда человѣцы начинаютъ по-мышляти зло о тѣхъ, что за границею, не видя въ нихъ образа Христова. Євангеліе не заповѣдуетъ намъ творити міръ по своему образу; оно велитъ узревати Христа въ странствую-щемъ, въ болящемъ, въ нищемъ и пришельцѣ, понеже рече-но: «Былъ есмь странникъ, и пріяхосте Мя».
     Слишкомъ часто нынѣшняя политическая жизнь становит-ся позорищемъ гнѣва, идеже побѣда цѣнится болѣе, нежели мудрость, и жестокость почитается силою. Церковь не должна подражати сему духу, и вѣрніи да не увлекаются таковыми нравами. Еще паче — да не почитаютъ сіе истиннымъ путемъ христіанскимъ. Мы не должны быти капелланами какова-либо земнаго царства, но совѣстью всякаго.
     Призваніе наше — стояти тамъ, идеже иные боятся стояти: между врагами, среди страждущихъ, въ мразѣ бурь мірскихъ. Мы не глаголемъ языкомъ партійнымъ — ни либеральныхъ, ни консервативныхъ, ни десныхъ, ни лѣвыхъ, — но яко христіане: Апостольскіе, Православные, Соборные. Мы долж-ны любити Истину болѣе, нежели тщетную побѣду мірскую, милость — болѣе, нежели покой, и Бога — болѣе, нежели су-етныя царства земныя.
     Церковь существовала прежде всякаго царства, имперіи или республики и пребудетъ, когда всѣ они прейдутъ. Многіе властители во времена различныя клялись истребити Цер-ковь на земли, и вотъ — мы стоимъ нынѣ. Мы пережили ихъ всѣхъ и пребудемъ впредь. Церковь не можетъ быть разру-шена, и даже когда видится, яко она стоитъ на краю бездны, Христосъ и Святая Его Церковь восторжествуютъ. Сего ради да живемъ яко граждане Небеснаго Царства — вѣрніи, мило-стивіи и безстрашніи. И да молимся о просвѣщеніи всѣхъ вла-стителей мірскихъ и всѣхъ человѣковъ ко Святѣй Вѣрѣ Хри-стовой.

Monday, September 8, 2025

Accession of the United Roman-Ruthenian Church and State to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961)

His Apostolic Highness the
Most Holy Prince-Bishop Radislav I,
Roman-Ruthenian Pope, signing
the Communiqué on the Accession
to the Vienna Convention
on behalf of the
United Roman-Ruthenian Church
ROME-RUTHENIA 8 September 2025 (NRom)


The Pontifical Secretariat has released the following communiqué on behalf of the Pontifical Household. 

Communiqué of the Holy Apostolic See of Rome-Ruthenia

On the Accession of the United Roman-Ruthenian Church and State to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961)

1. In the exercise of its sovereign rights as an ecclesiastical state, the Holy Apostolic See of Rome-Ruthenia, under the direction of the Supreme Pontiff of the United Roman-Ruthenian Church and the Pontifical Imperial State of Rome-Ruthenia thereof, hereby declares and notifies its formal accession to the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961).

2. The Roman-Ruthenian Church and State therefore affirms that, in accordance with customary international law, recognition of sovereignty is declaratory and not constitutive. Therefore, the Roman-Ruthenian Church and State, as a sovereign ecclesiastical entity with apostolic and historic mandate, non-territorial in present nature and non-territorial-seeking, noting that sovereignty of the Church by long-established principal does not derive from control of territory, accepts and applies the Convention as a matter of principle, practice, and good faith, without prejudice to its inherent rights.

3. By this declaration, the Roman-Ruthenian Church and State undertakes:

a. To extend to foreign envoys accredited to the Roman-Ruthenian Church and State the privileges and immunities foreseen under the Vienna Convention, in a spirit of reciprocity and international courtesy.

b. To continue its present practice under its own sovereign ecclesiastical authority to issue credentials to its own diplomatic representatives and officials in conformity with the norms of the Convention.

c. To apply the provisions of the Convention as customary international law, thereby ensuring the protection of diplomatic agents and the proper conduct of international relations.

4. This declaration is made in continuity with the practice of other sovereign ecclesiastical entities, such as the Holy See of Rome and the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, which have historically applied international diplomatic law independently of territorial considerations.

5. This declaration is also made in accordance with the statements of canonical status and temporal rights pertaining to the Roman-Ruthenian Church and State and the Constitution Fides Petraque, all hereunto appended. . Sovereignty derives not from territory, but from apostolic foundation and divine mandate.

6. Thus this declaration is not a new assertion but a continuation of existing practice on the part of the Roman-Ruthenian Church and State, which has continually asserted in theory and in practice its right to carry out acts proper to a sovereign ecclesiastical state (Appendix 4).

7. The Roman-Ruthenian Church and State will transmit copies of this declaration to the United Nations and to interested states and institutions, as well as promulgate it publicly. The Roman-Ruthenian Church and State notes that in the absence of objection, such silence shall be understood as acknowledgment of the said Church’s good faith acceptance and application of the Convention.

In witness whereof, this communiqué is issued under the hand and seal of His Apostolic Highness the Most Holy Prince-Bishop Radislav I, Roman-Ruthenian Pope, Supreme Pontiff of the URRC, on this Feast of the Nativity of the Holy Mother of God, 8 September A.D. 2025, at the Holy Apostolic See.

Appendix 1 - Canonical Status
Appendix 2 - Temporal Rights
Appendix 3 - Fides Petraque

Saturday, September 6, 2025

Rev. Jay Scott Newman, JCL

Rev. Jay Scott Newman, JCL — Historical Moment with Pope Radislav I

From the Stephenian Archives, Pontifical Apostolic Library.

Rev. Jay Scott Newman with Pope Radislav I during confirmation ceremony

His Apostolic Highness the Most Holy Pope Radislav I (right), then as a young layman on the occasion of his confirmation/Chrismation in the Roman Church, administered by the Rev. Jay Scott Newman, JCL (left), who would later serve as Chancellor of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston, USA. This sacramental moment remains of enduring significance in the life of the United Roman-Ruthenian Church. Read more here: https://www.statopontificio.org/papal.html



Friday, September 5, 2025

From the Archives: Pope Radislav and the Rt. Rev. James Pollard Clark


His Holiness Pope Radislav I of Rome-Ruthenia, then as a younger layman, with the Right Reverend Bishop James Pollard Clark, who started him in priestly formation. Bishop Clark was Bishop of the Southern States in the Anglican Province of Christ the King.

Read more here: https://www.statopontificio.org/papal.html

(From the Stephenian Archives, Pontifical Apostolic Library.)




Sunday, July 20, 2025

Statement by the United Roman-Ruthenian Church to the United Nations for the 2025 High-level Segment

By M. Derosiers

NEW YORK, 19 July 2025 (NRom)

In a compelling statement to the United Nations’ 2025 High-level Segment, the Holy Apostolic See of the United Roman‑Ruthenian Church (URRC) has called for a stronger role for faith-based and cultural institutions in achieving the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The statement, formally received by the UN Secretary-General, underscores the need for sustainable and inclusive progress that is both scientifically grounded and ethically informed.

Themed around “Advancing sustainable, inclusive, science- and evidence-based solutions for the 2030 Agenda,” this year’s high-level segment marks the 80th anniversary of the United Nations—a milestone that the URRC used as an opportunity to advocate for the integration of traditional values, ethical governance, and spiritual heritage into global development strategies.

A Call for Moral and Cultural Integration

The statement from the Holy Apostolic See emphasizes that technical innovation alone is insufficient to fulfill the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). According to the Church, long-term success demands a renewed commitment to dignity, tradition, and moral responsibility.

“As a transnational Orthodox ecclesiastical body with deep historical roots in Eastern and Western Christian traditions,” the Holy Apostolic See stated, “we are guardians of faith and liturgy and active participants in human development, peacebuilding, and ethical governance.”

Key Proposals Highlighted in the Statement

The Church outlined several areas where it believes faith-based communities, particularly those like the URRC with strong grassroots networks, can contribute meaningfully:
  • Integration of Faith Communities in SDG Implementation: URRC urged greater inclusion of religious institutions in education, healthcare, and moral development, noting their trusted presence at the local level.
  • Education Reform Rooted in Ethics: The Church advocates for systems that cultivate not only intellectual excellence but also virtues such as compassion, responsibility, and service to others.
  • Preservation of Intangible Cultural Heritage: The statement stressed that the survival of traditions such as language, liturgy, and music is crucial for community resilience and identity.
  • Intergenerational Programs: Emphasizing that both the elderly and the youth are vital to a healthy society, the URRC promoted dialogue and mentorship as tools to strengthen social cohesion.
  • Faith-Based Environmental Stewardship: Drawing from doctrinal principles, the Church called for development strategies that respect and integrate spiritual approaches to environmental ethics.
Spiritual Traditions as Pillars of Sustainability

In its conclusion, the Holy Apostolic See framed traditional communities not as relics of the past, but as catalysts for renewal in a fragmented world. “As we approach the milestone of 2030,” the statement reads, “may our shared commitment to truth, compassion, and justice guide us toward a future where no one is left behind.”

This submission marks one of the most robust interventions by a religious body during this year’s segment, reinforcing the growing recognition that sustainable development must be multidimensional, addressing not only the material but also the cultural and moral foundations of society.
____________________

Full Text of the URRC Statement

Full Text of the Statement by the United Roman‑Ruthenian Church to the United Nations for the 2025 High‑level Segment: Received by the Secretary‑General

Objective and Purpose:
This statement by the Holy Apostolic See of the United Roman-Ruthenian Church and its Pontifical Nunciature to the UN contributes to the 2025 ECOSOC High-Level Segment by emphasising the essential role of cultural, spiritual, and ethical traditions in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Drawing from its historic ecclesiastical identity and international presence, the Church offers proposals that support authentically inclusive and sustainable solutions rooted in human dignity, moral responsibility, and the preservation of traditional societies.

Statement
As the United Nations marks 80 years of multilateral progress, the United Roman‑Ruthenian Church affirms its support for authentic sustainable development grounded in dignity, tradition, and ethical responsibility. We believe that achieving the 2030 Agenda requires not only innovation and science but a reaffirmation of enduring spiritual and cultural values.

As a transnational Orthodox ecclesiastical body with deep historical roots in Eastern and Western Christian traditions, the URRC represents a unique ethno‑religious community that spans continents. We are guardians of faith and liturgy and active participants in human development, peacebuilding, and ethical governance.

Key Contributions and Proposals:

Faith‑based communities are often among the most stable and trusted institutions at the grassroots level. The URRC encourages the international community to better integrate such communities into SDG implementation, particularly in education, healthcare, and moral formation.

We advocate for educational systems that nurture intellectual growth and also emphasise ethical responsibility, compassion, and service to others.

The SDGs cannot succeed without preserving intangible cultural heritage. Language, liturgy, traditional music, and spiritual practices must be safeguarded as heritage and living resources for community resilience and development.

A society that forgets its elders or disregards its youth undermines itself. The URRC promotes initiatives that bring generations together in dialogue, mentorship, and community building. This strengthens identity and ensures that no one is left behind.

The URRC embraces the doctrinal principle of stewardship of creation. We support partnerships that incorporate faith‑based environmental ethics into sustainable development.

In a time of great uncertainty and social fragmentation, traditional communities can be powerful catalysts for renewal. The United Roman‑Ruthenian Church calls upon global partners to recognise the indispensable role of cultural and spiritual heritage in achieving a just, sustainable, and authentically inclusive world. As we approach the milestone of 2030, may our shared commitment to truth, compassion, and justice guide us toward a future where no one is left behind.

Thursday, July 10, 2025

In Memoriam: Major General Claudio Donnaloia, WG - Chief Heraldic Officer and Lifelong Servant to the Public Good


TARANTO 10 July 2025 (NRom)

The community of Taranto gathered with deep emotion in the Church of Sant’Antonio to bid farewell to Major General Claudio Donnaloia, a devoted public servant and long-standing civil protection volunteer, who tragically lost his life in a shipwreck last Sunday at the age of 73.

General Donnaloia was among four yachtsmen who went missing at sea. As of now, only one other body has been recovered. His brother Pasquale and fellow sailor Antonio dell’Amura remain unaccounted for.

A figure of steadfast commitment to public service, Donnaloia held the rank of Major General in the Pontifical Walsingham Guard and served as its Chief Heraldic Officer. Beyond his heraldic and military contributions, he dedicated years to civil protection as a volunteer with the Era Magna Graecia and served as national inspector for the Eco-Zoo Guard—roles that reflected his deep dedication to environmental preservation and humanitarian aid.

The funeral service was marked by solemnity and honor. His coffin, draped with symbols of his life’s mission, was accompanied by a guard of honor. Resting atop were his ceremonial cap and a photograph in full uniform — powerful reminders of a man whose life was defined by courage, discipline, and an unwavering sense of duty.

His body was recovered Monday evening off the coast of Bernalda, in the province of Matera. The search continues for the others who remain missing.

In mourning his loss, the community not only honors a distinguished officer, but a man whose life was rooted in solidarity, service, and an enduring commitment to the common good.

Friday, June 20, 2025

How the Roman-Ruthenian Pope’s Wave Function Probabilistic Demand Model Transformed Economic Thought

Radislav (Rutherford) of Rome-Ruthenia,
Father of Wave Function Probabilistic
Demand in economics.
Staff Editorial 

ROME-RUTHENIA 20 June 2025 (NRom)

 In the evolving landscape of economics, diplomacy, and behavioral science, one innovative framework stands out for its originality and lasting impact: the Choice Wave (originally known as Wave Function Probabilistic Demand) and its associated probabilistic demand model, developed in 2006 by His Apostolic Highness Prince-Bishop Radislav I, Roman-Ruthenian Pope (known also in academic circles as Dr. Rutherford Johnson, PhD, ALM, MSc, FRGS). The theory was subsequently empirically tested and proven with real-world financial data (see more here). And it formed the basis of his economics textbook used at the University of Minnesota, Practical Economics in an Ever-Changing World. 

A graduate of Harvard, Georgia Tech, and the University of Kentucky with degrees in Sustainability, Applied Physics, Economics, and Applied (Agricultural) Economics, he leads the global United Roman-Ruthenian Church, which holds special consultative status status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council. And, he is called the Father of the Wave Function in Economic Demand Theory. Pope Radislav’s groundbreaking work redefined how economists and policymakers approach decision-making. But, he is fundamentally a multidisciplinary behavioral scientist, and his work in wave function probability theory has been presented around the world and influences more than just economics. For example, it formed the mathematical basis for a capstone study he conducted at Harvard on police-public interactions, which also resulted in a policy memo for the United Nations. 

Yet, despite its originality and early contribution, Radislav’s theory has not always received formal recognition in later scholarship — even in studies advancing strikingly similar frameworks. As with many early innovations, the path from foundational insight to academic citation is often uneven. Nonetheless, the growing convergence around these ideas underscores their lasting relevance.

Indeed, Wave Function Probabilistic Demand, i.e., the Choice Wave, represents one of the earliest  known applications of quantum mechanics mathematics — specifically wave functions — to human decision-making in economics, as well as in policy, and beyond. The catchy name "Choice Wave" came from a conversation over coffee he had with one of his former professors while a Visiting Scholar at the Georgia Tech School of Economics, school chair Prof. Patrick McCarthy. 

Radislav (Rutherford) in a light moment in earlier years with
Dr. John Caufield, a pioneering figure in holography
 and a friend since youth. Radislav grew up around
many such international luminaries in the sciences.

Radislav's work, published first as a PhD dissertation in 2007 and then subsequently in multiple peer-reviewed journals, not only predates but in some respects anticipates key features of the better-known “quantum cognition,” "quantum economics," and “quantum decision theory” literature that gained visibility especially after 2011. 

...this theory would revolutionize
economic textbooks in 20 years...

Prof. Frank Scott, Gatton Professor of Economics at the University of Kentucky and a member of his PhD committee, said in 2007 that he believed this theory would revolutionize economic textbooks in 20 years. His PhD committee chair, the eminent environmental economist Prof. Angelos Pagoulatos, was also a proponent of the theory. Another committee member Prof. David Debertin wrote, "...on the basis of pure intellect, Rutherford outshines them all." 

Radislav with the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture

And it is not without recognition in the broader economics field. For example, in their 2021 article entitled "Asymmetrical Property of the Subproportionality of Weighting Function in Prospect Theory: Is It Real and How Can It Be Achieved?", Huang, Shen, Yang, Kuang, Li, and Li pointed out that Radislav's foundational work...

"...questioned the classical rationality and proposed that people are indeed different, but this point had been missing from economics."

While formal critiques of Radislav’s Choice Wave model appear rare or even non-existent in published scholarship, the theory’s reception — or lack thereof in some circles — may reflect broader dynamics in academic economics rather than shortcomings in the work itself. The model’s use of quantum mechanics mathematics, though rigorous, introduces a level of complexity that some economists might see as unnecessarily intricate compared to more familiar classical or behavioral approaches. There also appears to be a long-standing skepticism within the field about importing concepts from physics into the social sciences, with critics often wary that such frameworks may be metaphorically appealing but not always empirically essential.

Additionally, the theory’s limited mainstream adoption so far may stem less from flaws in its logic or utility, and more from disciplinary conservatism, branding gaps, and institutional inertia. New paradigms, especially those that challenge core assumptions, can take decades to gain recognition, as seen in the slow rise of behavioral economics. The Choice Wave’s distinctive terminology and its association with an unconventional academic path, including Radislav’s dual role as a religious leader, may have further complicated its integration into the standard canon. Rather than signaling a weakness, this situation presents an opportunity for the field to revisit and rigorously engage with early, innovative contributions that anticipated today’s growing interest in probabilistic and quantum-inspired models of decision-making.

What sets Radislav's contributions apart is their depth and breadth of not only theory, but practical application:

  • A rigorous mathematical model adapting Schrödinger’s wave equation to consumer and group choice.
  • Concepts like orthogonal Choice Waves representing distinct rationalities, multipoint gravitational models of influence, and the Theory of Parallel Rationality.
  • Applications spanning business strategy, diplomacy, marketing, sustainability, and policy.

The theory is more than a mere hypothetical concept, though. It has been both theoretically reviewed for its mathematical rigor and empirically tested with multiple real-world data sets. Building on psychological economics work of Kahneman, Tversky, Rabin, Russell, and Thaler, the Choice Wave model applies mathematical principles derived from wave functions in quantum mechanics to economics, permitting utility-maximizing choices across a range of probabilistically-weighted options rather than a single deterministic path. It recognizes that individuals and groups may operate with distinct yet rational decision strategies, each represented mathematically as an entirely independent wave function. 

Radislav (left) at university commencement exercises
with a Regent, the Chancellor, and Vice Chancellor
of the University of Minnesota Crookston

Long before probabilistic models of demand and behavioral economics gained widespread traction, Pope Radislav’s theory anticipated the need for frameworks that respect the diversity of human rationalities. The Choice Wave helps explain individual and collective behavior in markets, diplomacy, sustainability, and policy. It introduces the concept of natural and artificial “bridges” to align incentives across parallel economic worlds, fostering more optimal outcomes for complex societies.

Notable publications by Radislav (Rutherford) Johnson include:

Today, concepts building on the principles promoted by wave function probabilistic demand are visible throughout modern scholarship. From marketing to environmental policy and beyond, the ideas advanced by the Roman-Ruthenian Pope in 2006 continue to shape how experts think about choice, utility, and social alignment. 

Below are just a few examples of more recent articles in this rapidly developing field, many of which reflect ideas and frameworks that appear consistent with the principles Radislav first advanced in 2006.

In addition to ecclesiastical and diplomatic work, Radislav is a long-time academic. At the invitation of Woosong University President Dr. John Endicott, formerly head of the Center for International Strategy, Technology, and Policy at Georgia Tech, Radislav served at Woosong's SolBridge International School of Business in South Korea for three years as professor and university chaplain. He later served almost a decade on the faculty at the University of Minnesota's Crookston campus. Now, despite his many obligations, he teaches and guest lectures at universities around the world, including being on faculty at the London School of Business and Finance. In 2018, he was named a Fellow of the Royal Geographical Society, in 2022, he received the ACBSP Business Accreditation Council's Distinguished Teaching Award, and in 2023, he was named a Fellow of the Institute on the Environment at the University of Minnesota. 

Radislav (Dr. Rutherford Johnson) addressing the
campus at the University of Minnesota Crookston

As the global community grapples with increasingly intricate challenges, the Choice Wave model offers both a powerful analytic tool and a call to engage more deeply with the origins of the theories that guide modern policy. Indeed, we call on the economic field to give credit where credit is due. This is an invitation in the interest of academic integrity and scholarly thoroughness for authors, journals, and thought leaders to reflect, engage, and strengthen the rigor and inclusivity of economic science. Ultimately, we aim to foster a more complete, interconnected dialogue on innovative approaches to human decision-making. As the field continues to evolve, we encourage ongoing engagement with foundational contributions like those of Radislav, whose early work anticipated many of the developments we see today. Recognizing such origins helps strengthen the field’s intellectual integrity and depth.

We hope this reminder of the model’s origins encourages future work to engage more deeply with these foundational contributions.

Sunday, June 8, 2025

Fides Petraque: Apostolic Constitution of His Apostolic Highness Radislav I on the Continuity of the Holy Apostolic See and the Providence of God

21 May 2025



Приветствие и наше апостольское благословение!

“The Lord is my portion, saith my soul: therefore will I wait for Him.” Lamentations 3:24

I. The Time of Trial

Faith is a rock of truth. Yet, in these years of darkness and disarray, when truth has been eclipsed by confusion, when schism has cloaked itself in liturgy and heresy in the language of love, the visible structure of the Church has been grievously wounded. Rome, the Eternal City, has been occupied not by strangers, but by those who once bore the name of sons. Nevertheless, “a still small voice” (1 Kings 19:12) calls to the faithful.

II. The Succession in Fidelity

On the 21st day of April, anniversary of the founding of Rome, We, Radislav, a descendant of Holy Rus’ to which We are now heir, were received into full communion with the Holy See of Peter in Rome. On that same day, 23 years later, the Roman Pope died. We had been named in 2014 Coadjutor of Rome by the Cardinal Dean and given full papal authority in Our jurisdiction, i.e., what is now the United Roman-Ruthenian Church. Notably, the feast day of Our patron saint, Blessed George the Protomartyr and Bringer of Victory, falls on the 23rd of the same month. George, a military saint, but not merely of arms — a dragon-slayer, a witness unto death, a man of pure, Christ-centered courage. He is venerated in Russia, England, Greece, Syria, Lebanon, Ethiopia — a truly universal saint, uniting East and West. His icon slaying the dragon is a sign of Christ's victory over the devil, and by extension, of the Church's victory over falsehood, tyranny, and apostasy. This is the Church Triumphant whispering to the Church Militant.

Upon the death of the Roman Pope, the fullness and completion of what had been entrusted to Us came to fruition. Indeed, it is the mission to preserve the unity and continuity of the Holy Orthodox and Catholic Church, to which the Roman-Ruthenian Church is rightful and faithful successor; for We were named Coadjutor with right of succession, appointed and confirmed by word in document. It is a prophetic sign of divine continuity, a new Peter rising from the East, a re-anointing of the true Rome through fidelity and suffering. The Church, clasping sinners to her bosom, at once holy and always in need of purification, follows constantly the path of penance and renewal. (Lumen Gentium, 8)

It should also be remembered also that Our chrismation, many years before, in the traditional Anglican Rite, occurred on the 5th of August — the feast of the dedication of the Basilica of Saint Mary Major, the same basilica in which Pope Francis of Rome chose to be buried. It was from this basilica that the Western Church first proclaimed Mary as Theotokos after the Council of Ephesus. The First and Second Rome may fall, but the Mother remains — and the Spirit anoints the one she has chosen. Thus, from the Mother of God We were anointed, and to her We now entrust Our continued pontificate in its fullness. (See also this page.)

“All things work together for good for those who love God.” Romans 8:28

“In the fullness of time, God sent His Son.” Galatians 4:4

This is no coincidence. It is providence, not planning, for the Church reads the signs of the times in the light of the Gospel. (Gaudium et Spes, 4)

III. The Nature of the Papacy

The Ministry of Peter is not dependent upon marble, nor building in Rome, nor temporal sovereignty, nor the favor of emperors or media. It is a spiritual office, divinely instituted by Christ (cf. Matthew 16:18), exercised in service to unity and truth.

Canon law is sacred, yet it remains the servant of divine law, not its master. When the ordinary mechanisms for a legitimate, non-heretical papal election become impossible, provision may be made by the Pope or by legates duly authorized by him—for the Petrine office is founded not upon the will of men, but upon the Word of the Lord who said: ‘I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not.’ (Luke 22:32)

“Since to great Peter Christ our Lord gave the office of Chief Shepherd after entrusting him with the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, to Peter or his successor must of necessity every novelty in the Catholic Church be referred.” St. Theodore the Studite, Letter to Pope Leo III

IV. The United Roman-Ruthenian Church as the True Successor

Now, We and our bishops, validly consecrated, Orthodox in doctrine, and all of us together, the faithful and the clergy of the Roman-Ruthenian Church and State, have by declaration of Rome become the true Successor of Peter. We hold this not by election, but by designation, with the full moral, theological, and sacramental justification. We are not bound to Roman marble, but to the office, to the succession, and to fidelity.

We, the Roman-Ruthenian Church and State, hold this even when there may be an occupying Church, modernist, powerful, apostate; who claims Our right and authority. Yet the Church becomes once more Apostolic not only in name, but in form: and whether or not it be wandering, or poor, or hated by the world, it nevertheless bears the marks of Christ.

“We are made as the refuse of this world, the offscouring of all, even until now.” 1 Corinthians 4:13

The primacy of Peter is not geographical—it is personal and institutional (Pastor Aeternus, First Vatican Council). The essence of the papacy is to preserve unity and Orthodoxy, not to possess property. The material visibility of the Church can be obscured temporarily, but her spiritual reality never disappears (Lumen Gentium, 8). In times of great crisis, extraordinary actions are not innovation but preservation. And thus, Our Holy Apostolic See, by its right of succession and its preservation of Orthodoxy, is the true visible head of all Latin Christians, in addition to all others under her sacred mantle of care. And in so doing, we have returned the core of the Latin Church to true and authentic Orthodoxy.

Furthermore, here the ecclesiastical body commonly known as the Vatican Church—equated with the modern Roman Catholic Church—must be acknowledged as a distinct and separate entity. While it retains certain external forms of tradition, it has, in substance, embraced innovations and theological developments incompatible with the Apostolic deposit of the Orthodox and Catholic faith. We refer to its pontiff as the Roman Pope in fraternal charity, but not as a recognition of doctrinal or canonical supremacy. Nor do We contest its use of the title "Bishop of Rome," for We do not claim that diocesan office ourselves. Rather, We affirm that the visible primacy of the Latin Orthodox tradition has, by divine providence and ecclesiastical necessity, passed in spirit and function to the United Roman-Ruthenian Church — which alone among the Apostolic Churches preserves the Latin patrimony free from the distortions of modernism. Our purpose is not rivalry, but fidelity; not to supplant, but to preserve and to heal.

And yet, the United Roman-Ruthenian Church is not a Latin Church in disguise, nor a revival of Roman centralism, but rather the providential continuation of Rome’s mission through Holy Rus’. It is an Eastern Roman Church with Latin heritage, rooted in the Orthodox soul of Ruthenia (Old Russia), bearing the spiritual patrimony of both Latin and Byzantine tradition, the Slavic legacy, and the inheritance of the undivided Church. Our apostolic mission is the integration of Eastern and Western heritage into the Orthodox fullness — not by syncretism, but by harmony — in the spirit of the ancient Pentarchy and conciliarity. Rome, in this sense, has found its renewal under Rome-Ruthenia, not by conquest or politics, but by providential realignment in truth. Indeed, the One, Holy, Apostolic, Orthodox, and Catholic Church is the one, indivisible Church of Christ, not by works of men, but solely because, by the grace of God expressed in the Passion of Christ, in the blood of the martyrs, and in the witness of the saints, the Church has preserved to this day this, its God-given mission.

V. To the Faithful

We speak now not merely to the powerful, but to all the faithful, to the clergy and faithful who still proclaim the Creed in a world that has forgotten how to kneel before God, who still maintain and profess the Orthodox faith. You are not alone. The Church is not dead. Whether we be many, and whether we be joined or scattered, we are the true Church.

VI. A Call to Faith

To those clergy who are not corrupted, but Orthodox, We say keep the faith. To bishops who know the truth, have the courage to act in justice. To all Churches, wounded by schism, yet noble in faith, let us join together, not in submission, but in fulfillment. To all the faithful: hold fast, teach your children, confess the truth. Do not follow the false teachings of the era, but stay with the timeless faith of Christ. Together this, with the blood of the martyrs and the power of the confessors, is the seed of this new spring.

VII. Conclusion

Let us remember that Orthodoxy is truth: truth handed down, preserved, and lived. And the truth does not cease to be true because some will not accept it. (St. John of Damascus) “To be Orthodox means to have the God-man Christ constantly in your soul, to live in Him, think in Him, feel in Him, act in Him.” St. Justin Popovichф

From the East, in Holy Rus', Peter has risen again — not in personal glory, but in the glory of Christ. We do not claim perfection. We claim only what was given to Us: the keys, the cross, and the promise that the gates of hell shall not prevail.